Mobile advertising is a booming industry, with global spending expected to reach 798.7 billion in 2025. However, along with this growth, mobile ad fraud is also rising, costing businesses billions yearly. Fraudsters use deceptive tactics to generate fake clicks, impressions, and installs, draining marketing budgets without delivering real value.
This blog will explain mobile ad fraud, explain why it is increasing, and discuss how businesses can prevent it.
Mobile ad fraud refers to fraudulent activities that manipulate mobile advertising campaigns, leading to fake traffic, false installs, or misleading engagement metrics. These fraudulent activities result in wasted ad spend and skewed data, making it difficult for marketers to measure campaign effectiveness.
Mobile ad fraud comes in various forms, each designed to exploit weaknesses in advertising networks and attribution models. Below is a detailed breakdown of the most common types of mobile ad fraud and how they work:
Click Injection is a highly deceptive type of fraud in which fraudsters inject fake clicks just before a legitimate app is installed. This tricks the ad network into attributing the install to the fraudster instead of the source.
Click spamming happens when fraudsters generate large volumes of fake clicks, hoping that some will be falsely attributed to real user installs. These clicks are not genuine user actions but relatively automated or background-generated interactions.
An install farm is a network of real people or devices performing fraudulent installs and fake interactions. These farms operate to trick advertisers into thinking their app is getting legitimate downloads.
SDK spoofing, or traffic spoofing, occurs when fraudsters send fake app install signals to ad networks. This creates the illusion of authentic downloads, even when no actual installs have occurred.
Ad stacking is when multiple ads are layered on top of each other within the exact ad placement. Even though users see only one ad, impressions and clicks are recorded for all the ads underneath.
Bots are automated scripts designed to mimic human behaviour, such as clicking on ads, watching videos, and even filling out forms. Fraudsters use bot traffic to generate fake engagements that seem real but offer zero value to advertisers.
Unlike install farms, device farms use real or virtual mobile devices to generate fake installs and interactions. These farms are designed to trick advertisers into believing they are acquiring real app users.
Location spoofing occurs when fraudsters fake geographic data to make ads appear as if users are viewing them in a specific high-value location.
Mobile ad fraud works by manipulating ad metrics to generate revenue for fraudsters. The typical process includes:
Mobile ad fraud is rising at an alarming rate due to multiple factors, including the rapid growth of digital advertising, sophisticated fraud techniques, and a lack of awareness among advertisers. Below are the key reasons why mobile ad fraud is increasing:
With mobile advertising expected to reach $798.7 billion by 2025, fraudsters see this as a lucrative opportunity. The higher the ad spend, the greater the incentive for fraudsters to exploit weaknesses in the system. Since advertisers are willing to invest heavily in user acquisition and brand awareness, fraudsters create fake traffic and engagements to siphon off marketing budgets.
The mobile ad industry involves multiple intermediaries, including ad networks, exchanges, and publishers. This complexity makes it easier for fraudsters to hide their activities and harder for advertisers to track fraudulent interactions. Many advertisers rely on third-party ad networks, where fraudsters can easily infiltrate the system and generate fake engagement.
Many advertisers lack robust fraud detection tools and depend on traditional metrics such as Click-Through Rates (CTR) and impressions. Fraudsters manipulate these metrics using bot traffic, click spamming, and install farms, making it difficult for advertisers to identify fraudulent activity until significant losses occur.
Fraudsters constantly evolve their techniques, leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to make more refined scams. For example, SDK spoofing allows fraudsters to simulate legitimate installs without requiring real users. AI-driven bots can mimic user behaviour, making it harder for ad networks to detect fraudulent activity.
Advertisers often focus on performance-based models such as Cost Per Install (CPI), Cost Per Click (CPC), and Cost Per Mille (CPM). Fraudsters use these models by faking installs, clicks, and views to earn commissions without delivering real users. This trend has increased fraudulent activities like click Injection and ad stacking.
The mobile ad industry lacks standardized regulations and strict enforcement measures to combat fraud. While some organizations, such as the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB), have introduced guidelines, no global governing body regulates fraud prevention. As a result, fraudsters continue to exploit vulnerabilities in different ad networks.
Programmatic advertising automates the buying and selling of ad placements, making it easier for fraudsters to exploit automated systems. Since programmatic ads rely on algorithms, fraudsters use fake impressions and bot traffic to manipulate ad spend and generate revenue.
With more users shifting to mobile apps for shopping, gaming, and social media, in-app advertising has surged. Fraudsters target this trend by injecting fake app installs, ad stacking, and SDK spoofing to make it appear that real users are engaging with ads. Since app developers rely on ad revenue, fraudsters exploit this dependency to generate illegitimate earnings.
Many ad networks do not provide complete transparency regarding traffic sources and audience data. This makes it easier for fraudsters to operate within the ecosystem and go undetected. Some networks prioritize profits over fraud detection, allowing fraudulent traffic to pass through their platforms.
Unlike traditional fraud that requires physical access, mobile ad fraud can be conducted remotely from anywhere in the world. Fraudsters operate from multiple locations, making it challenging for law enforcement agencies to track them down. Some fraudulent operations even run at an industrial scale, with entire networks dedicated to ad fraud activities.
Mobile ad fraud has severe consequences for advertisers, including:
Here are some warning signs that indicate ad fraud:
Several advanced tools help in fraud detection and prevention:
To combat ad fraud, businesses can take the following steps:
According to a 2023 study by Juniper Research, mobile ad fraud could cost businesses over $100 billion annually if not controlled. Companies that fail to adopt preventive measures risk losing up to 20% of their ad budgets to fraudsters.
If you suspect ad fraud, take these steps:
Feature | Mobile Ad Fraud | Desktop Ad Fraud |
Common Methods | Click spamming, SDK spoofing, install farms | Bot traffic, click fraud, ad stacking |
Target | Mobile apps, in-app ads | Websites, display ads |
Detection | Requires app-specific tools | Web analytics tools |
AI plays a crucial role in fighting ad fraud by:
Mobile ad fraud is a growing threat, but businesses can safeguard themselves with the right tools, monitoring strategies, and awareness. Advertisers can minimise losses and maximise genuine engagement by partnering with trusted ad networks, using AI-driven fraud detection, and educating their teams.
If you're serious about protecting your ad budget, implement these strategies today!
SEO Executive - Public Media Solution
Buddhisagar Bhosale is the SEO Executive at Public Media Solution, a leading marketing, PR, and branding company based in India.